Pages

Tuesday, December 30, 2008

Today's Suggested Reading

I've been meaning to post this for awhile: http://www.csicop.org/scienceandmedia/definitions/. It's an article recommended by Darlene the Science Cheerleader on what, specifically, we mean by scientific literacy. I leave its implications as an exercise for the reader.

*

Another item that's been on my desk for awhile, but which I haven't had time to write about is the idea of a "science court," wherein the great scientific issues of the day would be decided by a tribunal of scientists who are NOT experts in the fields under discussion--i.e., you wouldn't have climatologists with vested interests deciding the validity of global warming claims--but scientists of sufficient experience, education, and merit to be able to make decisions more or less objectively. The court would deal specifically and only with the facts and theories of a particular discipline--i.e., which theory is more "correct"--not with their policy implications.

The more I read this article, the more dubious I became about the science court's prospects. Suppose, for example, the science court was televised. The general public, watching a very slick and impassioned presentation might think that that person had "won," whereas the scientists on the panel might have a completely different reaction based strictly on the data. Mightn't this sort of environment encourage claimants to "play to the gallery?" Or would the science court necessarily be a closed event?

Also, since Arthur Kantrowitz first proposed this idea, science has become even more politicized than it was in the '70s and '80s. Even scientists not directly connected to a particular issue more often than not have opinions on such things. But then I suppose the same thing could be said about courts of law, and yet we continue to have some faith in an unbiased judicial system.

Sunday, December 28, 2008




Book Review: Dreamers of the Day

I missed Mary Doria Russell's latest book when it came out in hardcover, but I decided to pick up the paperback of Dreamers of the Day for my airplane reading this past week. My reading of this book was timely, given my recent reviews of Paris 1919, The First World War, and Strategy, as it is set in America and the Middle East after World War I. In this story, Russell places a middle-aged spinster from Cleveland, Ohio in the midst of the Spanish Flu of 1918 and then the negotiations that established the troubled borders and nations that are fighting today, especially Iraq, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, and Israel.

I had several reactions to this book, some good, some not as good, so I'll start out by saying nice things (for my reviews of the author's other works, see here, here, and here). For instance, while I got into Russell's books because she wrote science fiction, her writing has been of such quality that I was quite willing to read others as they have come up, regardless of genre.

Dreamers of the Day continues Ms. Russell's fantastic ability to manipulate English prose. The book is shorter than some of her other works (249 pages or so, plus a "study section" in the back), but the reading experience is something else altogether. I read one review on Amazon that complained that "it felt longer." I took that rather as a virtue of the book, as Russell manages to weave her story along and take the reader many different places in the character's life and experience in very few pages. This is quite an achievement, and in sharp contrast to, say, The Historian, which is also a "literary" book and could not shut up until 676 pages were consumed.

What, then, is the story? Russell presents us with Agnes Shanklin, who is orphaned and loses all her family in the Spanish Flu that broke out in the last year of World War I. Agnes, whom Russell has narrating her own story, describes herself as not terribly attractive and very much under the spell of her lost "Mumma." The middle child and also the obedient one, Agnes never managed to please her mother when she was alive, so when her mother dies, she decides to take the opportunity to remake herself. If she doesn't break totally with her desire to please Mumma, she does at least strike out for independence and doing things she wants to do, like remaking her wardrobe and traveling to the Middle East, where her more attractive and vivacious sister spent some time as a missionary.

And here's where I started squirming in my seat. How does Agnes start hanging out with the leading lights of the day--T.E. Lawrence, Winston Churchill, and Gertrude Bell? Because of her sister the missionary. That might warrant a polite, "Nice to meet you" from these upper-crust types, but would one expect that this fish-out-of-water American lady would be invited into their discussions about the Middle East? That was a bit of a stretch for me. Still, to Russell's credit, she doesn't put Agnes in the Cairo Peace Conference or making huge changes to world history. She does, instead, have Agnes going along to some of the formal dinners or painting excursions (with Churchill) or public speeches or camel rides (with Churchill and Lawrence). She exchanges petty insults with Gertrude Bell, gossips with Churchill's bodyguard, and has a relationship with a German spy. Nothing too over the top, but enough to put Agnes "in the middle of the action," so to speak. Agnes is a perfect "innocent eye" to view the personalities who shaped the modern Middle East.

One thing Russell does early on in the book is compare the run-up to World War I to the U.S. entry into the war in Iraq, with lines like "Anyone who protested, or even voiced reluctance, was called a traitor. Mr. Eugene Debs was sentenced to decades in prison. His crime? He said that a war abroad did not excuse tyranny at home." Or: "The cost is all out of proportion to whatever we can expect to reap from that wilderness [Iraq]." Or: "The relentless concealment! The British public were tricked into this adventure in Mesopotamia by a steady withholding of information." Or: "Eugene Debs spoke truth to power!"

At this last comment, I thought I was in the Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill hearings. If I'm to believe my internet research, this phrase didn't enter the public discourse until 1955, making it an anachronism. And even if that term is older--I'm more than suspicious of "facts" I find in cyberspace--it jarred me out of my reading experience and exclaim, "Oh, come on!" The attitudes in the book are politically liberal: I get it. Sometimes I just don't like to be hit over the head with it.

From what I've read and seen depicted about Churchill and Lawrence, they seemed to be acting "in character." Gertrude Bell was an unknown figure to me, but portrayed believably, as Russell always does well. Russell overlooks how much trouble Churchill and her long-time hero Lawrence ("Lawrence of Arabia") caused for the modern world by spreading the doctrine of "asymmetrical warfare." B. H. Liddell Hart noted this problem in Strategy--and Hart was actually friends with Lawrence. One might admire his bravery and (perhaps) his idealism in trying to imbue the Arabs with a sense of nationalism and independence, but the West has reaped the whirlwind he sowed. The path India took toward dominion status and nationhood was more homegrown and more honorable than the paths taken in the Middle East, and as far as I know the Indians and Pakistanis didn't seize any profit-making businesses built by the West when they became independent. That is a political disagreement on my part, not necessarily within the scope of the book, but one that bugged me nonetheless.

As to the story of Agnes herself, she is by turns ignorant, standoffish, charming, obedient, independent, direct, gullible, and finally, hopeful. The book ends on a note of reflection and magical realism (I leave that for the reader to discover), but also inconclusiveness. Russell wants to make some points about the times Agnes lived through and their impacts on the modern Middle East, and I'd say she makes them. Does the book result in a happy ending for Agnes? I leave that as an exercise for the reader. Dreamers of the Day is worth reading, even if it doesn't satisfy as much as Ms. Russell's books. I continue to look forward to her future efforts.

Monday, December 22, 2008

Identifying What's Wrong With America

For those folks who have been trying to tell me that the private sector is not to be trusted, that private industry executives have utterly failed the public trust, and that only government can "fix" things and bring law, regulation, and order back to the economy, society, et cetera...I give you two words: Rod Blagojevich.

Book Review: Homesteading Space: The Skylab Story

I'm finishing up my review of Homesteading Space right now. It'll appear in the next edition of Ad Astra. For now, all I can recommend is that you don't walk, but run to the nearest book store or online book vendor and see what you can do about adding this to your favorite space geek's book collection--and get one for yourself. With so much boredom or ignorance surrounding the International Space Station (actual quotation from a Huntsville local: "Do we launch that from here?"), it is worthwhile to pick up a book that manages to make America's first space station an exciting and entertaining story. Don't bother sending me one, though: I've already got my copy, and it's autographed by one of the authors. (This space-geek gig does have its bennies now and then.)

Merry Christmas!

/b

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

Guest Blogging on Education

Darlene the Science Cheerleader asked me to do a blog on the latest math and science scores. It'll be interesting to see the results/response. Corporal punishment was not the emphasis of the piece, merely one possibility if we wanted to replicate other nations' classroom practices to get the same results.

Part Two of that blog will focus on what we should teach children, and perhaps how. I'll be pinging some of my professional educator friends for suggestions.

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

At Last, Justice for Adam Walsh

John Walsh has been fighting for justice--both for his murdered son and others--for 27 years. Today, he received word that the Hollywood, Florida, Police Department has declared a drifter, Ottis Toole, as the murderer of Walsh's son, Adam. I must confess, this moment moved me. Walsh has been a fixture in the public arena for much of my life, and Adam, had he lived, would have been only six years younger than me.

Adam's murder fundamentally changed Walsh's life, perhaps in ways he could not begin to comprehend 27 years ago. At the time, it was about his grief and his desire to find the man who'd killed his son, leaving only the boy's head to be found. But the fame generated by a made-for-TV movie about his son's disappearance gave Walsh a lever to move the world. Eventually, he created America's Most Wanted, a TV show hosted by Walsh, which not only continued the search for his son's murderer, but resulted in the capture of hundreds of other criminals. Walsh became a crusader for the capture of bad people, and I believe he changed other lives as well as his own.

I hope somehow the Walsh family is able to find peace with this discovery, and wonder what the future will bring for them. I don't doubt that every day John and Revé and their other children had to live with the ghost of Adam in their house, and I hope that they will be able to now put him to rest. I wish them all well.

Monday, December 15, 2008

The Shoe Thing















I know, a lot of media outlets today are just cheering happily about an Iraqi journalist calling President Bush a "dog" and throwing a shoe at him as "the worst possible insult" in Islam. (Funny, I thought humiliating a man naked was the worst possible insult--at least that's what I heard when Abu Ghraib happened.)

The cheering section has forgotten something. The guy thinks Bush is a tyrant, and now he's got people chanting in the streets as if he's some sort of folk hero. All well and good.

But consider an alternate scenario. Imagine the guy he'd thrown a shoe at was Saddam Hussein. What do you suppose would have happened in Saddam's Iraq if the most powerful man in that country had had a shoe thrown at him? Would he be alive today? Would there be crowds cheering in the streets? No. That man would have been captured by Saddam's secret police, beaten up, and slowly lowered into a wood chipper. There would have been no show of public support for fear of similar treatment.

Now, did we really need to go in there? Perhaps not. But imagine where that journalist would be if he'd had similar spunk with a very different leader.

Sunday, December 14, 2008

Thought for the Day

From NASA Administrator Mike Griffin:

"I don't know who hosts which TV talk show, or care. I first heard of Saturday Night Live through all the hoopla surrounding their twenty-fifth anniversary. But being ignorant of those things has given me more time to learn, and to apply what I've learned, to the physics, engineering, and management challenges of my profession, aerospace. If that makes me a "nerd" or "geek" or a "workaholic", then it does. I know the conventional wisdom about leading a balanced life, but I have not done it. The people I know who set out to accomplish something meaningful in their careers have not done so either. They too are nerds, geeks, and workaholics. Frankly, I think our society owes a great deal to such people."

I can relate.

Saturday, December 13, 2008

Another Disappointing Pizza Experience

I'm always pleased when someone makes the effort to open a new pizza joint (linguistic note: "joint" is Chicagoese for "place"). I keep hoping against hope that someone--a chain, an individual entrepreneur--will do things right. Alas, I remain convinced that a decent thin-crust pizza cannot be made south of Interstate 80, west of Interstate 39, north of the Illinois border, or east of the Ohio border. Is that a close enough range for you? Anyhow, there are several distinguishing characteristics of this style of pizza, which might help the casual browser in understanding what this particular writer qualifies as "decent."

  • A round pie, with cheese toppings that run to, or nearly to (but not exceptionally over), the edge.
  • Thin, crisp crust.
  • Slices cut in a grid pattern.
  • A salty-sweet tomato sauce that is prevalent and distinctive enough to make its presence known, but not so thick that messes are inevitable.
  • Mozzarella cheese from grain-fed Midwestern dairy cows.
  • Italian-seasoned sausage from grain-fed Midwestern hogs.
  • Light Italian seasonings scattered across the face of the cheese.
  • No "freaky" toppings. "Freaky," in this case, includes ham, pineapple, goat cheese, exotic or expensive mushrooms, capers, leafy-green vegetables, or anything that doesn't sound like "sausage" or "pepperoni." Cheese pizzas are acceptable, as long as the option is open to add toppings as the consumer sees fit.
  • (Ideally) made by actual Chicago Italians or by those who have been trained by them.

Your mileage may vary.

Anyhow, the latest restaurant not to meet the standards above is Noble Roman's Pizza on Madison Boulevard. Noble Roman's is a dual operation/store with Tuscano's(?) Deli, for folks who feel like an Italian sub instead of a pizza. I did not have a sub there, but might give it a try on some other day. Today I just went for an individual pizza with sausage and pepperoni. Usually I go for a straight-up cheese and sausage for callibration purposes--if they can't handle the basics, they don't get a second shot with me for any other flavor, but I was a bit hungry.

The meal also came with breadsticks and a choice of cheese, marinara, or garlic sauce on the side. I'm pretty sure I said garlic, but the guy gave me the cheese, which was more of a nacho cheese, heavy on the jalapenos. He fixed the sauce, and that was a bit better. The bread sticks had a dry, mottled texture, and didn't wow me.

I was there for the pizza, though, and here is where I hit my snags. The cheese was quite a bit from the edge of the crust, and the crust was pretzel brown. The pepperoni was fine, but the tomato sauce made no impression on me, and the sausage, on its own, was more like bits of breakfast sausage than Italian. I detected no spices on the cheese or the rest of the pizza, forcing me to add salt--something that should be unnecessary on a pizza with pepperoni on it.

On the plus side, the sweet tea in the place was decent, though both dispensers said only "iced tea," not indicating if one was sweet or not. That was a minor annoyance. The primary annoyance was simply that I still have yet to have a "just like home" pizza outside of the aforementioned geographic range. New York-style pizza, which I have had in NYC, translates (alas) easily across state or regional boundaries. "Chicago-style" thick-crust pizza also does fairly well outside the 312 area code, though Pizzeria Uno's standards have come down since the franchise expanded. Thin-crust pizza of the type described above does not travel well, for a variety of reasons I have yet to deduce. But my compliments to the folks in the Midwest who manage to work their magic. I don't get home very often, but when I do, I always make sure to include some of their product in my itinerary. Meanwhile, the quest for a good, thin-crust pizza continues.

Buon apetitto!

Friday, December 12, 2008

Only in America...Free Cruise Scams

So I got this envelope in the mail today from "Imperial Majesty Cruise Line Vacations," offering me a free cruise for two, plus a $1,300 travel voucher, "no strings attached." It's not like I would've gone, but I was just curious to know if my BSometer was callibrated correctly. Turns out it was. See

The wonderful news about the internet is that scams are easier to track. I suppose their target audience is old folks or people too stupid to know that "no strings attached" means you're about to be tied up in miles of string and Deus knows what else.

Caveat emptor, y'all.

Wednesday, December 10, 2008

People of the Screen, People of the Book

I just finished reading an amazing article in The New Atlantis titled “
People of the Screen.” Go ahead and read that first. I'll wait.

Okay, now, this article continues a battle that was being waged when I was in tech writing grad school (1999-2002): do computers and other electronic gadgets undermine or redefine what it means to be “literate?” I find myself in a unique position relative to the People of the Book and the People of the Screen, as I am a user of both.

The author discusses the cognitive differences between reading on a computer and reading a book. Book reading is obviously more linear. Books have a beginning, middle, and end, and they proceed in that order without a lot of noise or special effects. Computer reading is more like scanning or “reading” the TV. The text is there, but so are advertisements, music, animations, and hyperlinks, begging for your attention.

Cognitively, book reading is a very different activity from “surfing.” Book reading is quieter and requires a certain passivity as one allows another person—the author—to string words together in order to create a story and (if you have the imagination for it) images in your mind. The reader is the student, following a trail laid out by someone else, and can have the pleasures of “getting away from it all” or “escaping” to another world without a lot of effort. The reader might expand their personal intellectual or emotional horizons or learn something new by absorbing the ideas of another person.

The hypertext reader is operating within a created environment, as the book reader is, but has more control over the flow of events. Hyperlink A leads to Hyperlink B leads to Hyperlink C, and the original flow of text is disrupted by a reader-directed search for specific information. Video game players, too, operate within an environment created by someone else, and are expected to have much more control and autonomy than a book reader. Goals are established externally, more or less, and the player must reach those goals by trial and error. The fundamental difference (usually) between video gaming and hypertext fiction is that the visual environment is created for the player, much as movies imagine a book author’s “world” for the audience member.

My primary concerns about this shift from books to computers are their effects on basic and
technical literacy, writing, and philosophy. Hypertext is, perhaps, the ultimate revenge of Jacques Derrida and the Deconstructionists, who have sought to question many or all of the assumptions put into writing (mostly by Western white males) by “deconstructing” every single term in a text (however you define it)*. I got one of two B’s in grad school partly because of my visceral distaste for this sort of thinking and my willingness to state so to the professor. Technical writers, especially, need to be very particular about the words they use to do their jobs, as technical results (or even lives) might be on the line if the wrong word or word order is used. So to subject a technical writer to the notion that the true meanings of words are problematic—and indeed, can be willfully or playfully messed with—is not a welcome one.

[* Sidebar Explanation: For example, a documentation writer might say that a technical document is a success if anyone picking up the document could follow the instructions and come up with the same results as anyone else (e.g. a recipe). A Deconstructionist, thinking him or herself inherently cleverer than the empirically “simple” tech writer, would ask, “Whom do you mean by anyone? What are your educational, economic, geographic, age-ist, racial, sexual, or political assumptions about that ‘anyone’? See? Your simple document isn’t written for ‘just anyone,’ is it?” And so the postdoc Deconstructionist gallops off merrily to write another monograph, happy with the chaos and extra paperwork they’ve caused for the tech writer. Meanwhile, the tech writer is left with the chore of adding a carefully worded disclaimer to the document to answer the Deconstructionist’s questions, and then hoping like hell that the reader, however defined and explained, can still do the basic task, which is to follow the damned directions.]

Now to keep myself honest and cut the Deconstructionists a little slack, I do write in hypertext, especially on this blog, wherein I link to various places on the Internet to make or amplify my points on this or that subject. It is also obviously true that I qualify as both regularly and digitally literate. However, I was just plain literate first, and that experience shapes my approach to blog writing, which is to say, I write as a linear text writer. My hyperlinks are more like footnotes, not deliberate links meant to “complicate” or “decontextualize” my words. If anything, my links reinforce my meaning.


Anyhow, there’s a philosophical dimension to Deconstructionism that is often overlooked because it seems so distant from real-world concerns. But notice my earlier distaste. What was it that I found so distasteful? Simple: nihilism. I don’t like the notion that “we don’t truly know what words mean.” If words can mean anything (“
It depends on what your definition of ‘is’ is,” sayeth Clinton the Sage), then they might as well mean nothing. I believe that words can have somewhat consistent meanings across time—for instance, I’ve read translations of 2,500-year-old Greek and Latin authors and managed to enjoy the experience without a great deal of turmoil. If you don’t believe that words can have shared meanings across cultures or across time, then the Wizards of Smart who write dictionaries and textbooks and “set the intellectual tone” of the language will be the ones who decide what words mean based on pure politics.

So how does this relate to hypertext? Two words:
Google Bombing. As Wikipedia (a bastion of hypertext if ever there was one) puts it,

A Google bomb (or "link bomb") is Internet slang for a certain kind of attempt to raise the ranking of a given page in results from a Google search, often with humorous or political intentions.
Overload the Internet with your own alternative meanings, and people start to believe it. It’s the 21st century version of “
The Big Lie,” which Wikipedia puts thusly:

The Big Lie (German: GroĂźen LĂĽge) is a propaganda technique. It was defined by Adolf Hitler in his 1925 autobiography Mein Kampf as a lie so "colossal" that no one would believe that someone "could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously".
Lastly, there’s my earlier
concern about trying to educate children about math or science using hypertext or video games. Can it be done? I remain to be convinced. Just as video game playing requires a different cognitive attitude from passive reading, so playing around the internet has a different approach than doing long division, algebra, trigonometry, calculus, and other forms of math.

So to take my revenge on the 21st century, I think I’ll turn off the computer and spend the rest of the night reading a book. Sounds like a fabulous way to spend a quiet evening.

Monday, December 08, 2008

Follow-Up: Bad Behavior, Embarrassing Pictures, and Job Security in Internet Age

Having vented previously on people's foolish behavior on the internet, I now must take a contrary stance. Why? Because, while the new reality of the world is that individuals can get fired for bad or embarrassing behavior they exhibit on the internet, that doesn't necessarily mean that it's good or right.

That Obama speech writer was tacky, but did his behavior rise to the level of a punishable offense? Did a hockey player deserve to be suspended from his job because of some sexist, crass remark about a former girlfriend? It depends on who you talk to.

When people talk about "political correctness," this is what they mean. There are just Some Things That Must Not Be Said. It is a manner of thinking and speaking that restrains anything that might be perceived as insulting to particular individuals or groups. Now am I endorsing full-out rudeness, crudity, or impolite behavior? No. However, I know that no one is capable of perfectly well-behaved, appropriate speech, partially because the rules keep changing, and partially just because people are people, and slips of the tongue are likely to happen. In short, we need to lighten up.

The end result of PC-speak is, as George Orwell notes in his description of Newspeak in 1984, to restrict the range of political speech and (by derivation) thought. If you can't say certain things--laughing at or judging particular behaviors--it becomes impossible to offer up alternative views. So today businesses will fire someone because of individual, personal crassness. What will be next? What happens when it's your turn to make a slip that shows up on the internet?

How do we fix this? I have no frickin' clue.

Sunday, December 07, 2008

The 2008 Reading List, Revisited

Awhile back, I set myself the task of reading some books that had been on my "to do" pile for several years. Bolded items below indicate that the book was read. Bolded items with an asterisk (*) indicate that I didn't finish the book.

Fiction
To the Stars Robert A. Heinlein
The Historian Elizabeth Kostova
Mother of Storms John Barnes
The Shield of Time Poul Anderson
The Decameron Giovanni Boccaccio*
Faust Johann Wolfgang Goethe
Inferno Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle
Fleet of Worlds Larry Niven and Edward M. Lerner
The Crook Factory Dan Simmons
Maus: A Survivor's Tale Art Spiegelman

History
The Guns of August Barbara Tuchman
The Soul of Battle: From Ancient Times to the Present Day, How Three Great Liberators Vanquished Tyranny Victor Davis Hanson
The Heritage of World Civilizations Albert M. Craig
Reflections on a Ravaged Century Robert Conquest
100 Decisive Battles: From Ancient Times to the Present Paul K. Davis*
The Crusades: Iron Men and Saints Harold Lamb
The Great Frontier Walter Prescott Webb
American Diplomacy: A History Robert H. Ferrell
The American Way of War: A History of United States Military Strategy and Policy Russell F. Weigley
The Influence of Sea Power on World History Alfred Thayer Mahan

Science, Technology, & Space
Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist's Guide to Global Warming Bjorn Lomborg
The Anthropic Cosmological Principle John D. Barrow*

The Bottomless Well: The Twilight of Fuel, the Virtue of Waste, and Why We Will Never Run Out of Energy Peter W. Huber
Arcology: The City in the Image of Man Paolo Soleri
Project Orion: The True Story of the Atomic Spaceship George Dyson
The Space Elevator: A Revolutionary Earth-to-Space Transportation System Bradley C. Edwards
Angle of Attack: Harrison Storms and the Race to the Moon Mike Gray
Toward Distant Suns T. A. Heppenheimer
Colonies in Space T. A. Heppenheimer
Terraforming: Engineering Planetary Environments Martyn J. Fogg

Philosophy & Politics
The Two Cultures C. P. Snow
The Conscience of a Conservative Barry Goldwater
Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature, and Method Kenneth Burke
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds Martin Fridson*
Space and the American Imagination Howard McCurdy
Trans-Mambo Chicken and the Trans-Human Condition: Science Slightly Over the Edge Ed Regis
The Culture Cult: Designer Tribalism & Other Essays Roger Sandall
Ideas Have Consequences Richard M. Weaver
The Culture We Deserve: A Critique of Disenlightenment Jacques Barzun
A Republic, Not an Empire Patrick Buchanan

Business
Strategic Planning for Public Relations Ronald D. Smith
Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power and Greatness Robert K. Greenleaf
Generations at Work: Managing the Clash of Veterans, Boomers, Xers, and Nexters in Your Workplace Ron Zemke
Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do And Why They Do It James Q. Wilson
Economic Principles Applied to Space Industry Decisions Paul Zarchan
The Handbook of Strategic Public Relations and Integrated Communications Clarke L. Caywood
Market Education: The Unknown History Andrew Coulson
Kiss, Bow, or Shake Hands: How to Do Business in Sixty Countries Terri Morrison
Creating Public Value Mark Harrison Moore

Biography
Isambard Kingdom Brunel
L.T.C. Rolt
Boyd: The Fighter Pilot Who Changed the Art of War Robert Coram
My Grandfather's Son Clarence Thomas

Korolev: How One Man Masterminded the Soviet Drive to Beat America to the Moon James Harford
Tramp Royale Robert A. Heinlein
Grumbles from the Grave Robert A. Heinlein

Okay, not a great percentage: 12 of 53 listed actually read. However, in my defense, I did read several other books that weren't on the list, which were "targets of opportunity" (i.e. impulse buys, often purchased when a particular book that WAS on the list couldn't be found on the day I was browsing the shelves at Barnes & Noble). These include:

  1. A History of Knowledge, Charles Van Doren
  2. Paris 1919, Margaret Macmillan
  3. Old Man's War, John Scalzi
  4. Manliness Harvey, C. Mansfield
  5. The Rough Guide: First-Time Europe
  6. Frommer's Europe
  7. A Moveable Feast, Ernest Hemingway
  8. The Sun Also Rises, Ernest Hemingway
  9. Fodor's Ireland
  10. Frommer's Ireland
  11. Rick Steeves' Europe Through the Back Door, Rick Steeves
  12. Europe 101, Rick Steeves
  13. Societal Impact of Spaceflight
  14. Founding Brothers, Joseph Ellis
  15. Beyond Reason: Using Emotions As You Negotiate, Roger Fisher and Daniel Shapiro
  16. If Life is a Bowl of Cherries, What Am I Doing in the Pits?, Erma Bombeck
  17. Oath of Fealty, Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle
  18. Mercury, Ben Bova
  19. Creating Character Emotions, Ann Hood
  20. Stages to Saturn, Roger Bilstein
  21. The Devil in the White City, Erik Larson
  22. Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking, William James
  23. The First World War, John Keegan

So: 35 books read for the year, about three per month. Not bad, but I'm going to have to ration myself this coming nine months, if I want to have the bandwidth to work on my French and German. Maybe I could compromise and try to read some of the books on my list in another language--Goethe in German, perhaps? Heinlein in French? That could be interesting. Anyhow, it's weird how books I want to read keep remaining on "the list," while tactical decisions get picked up and absorbed in a short time. That's why I occasionally cut back on "the list." After all, if the book was that important, I probably would've read it by now, yes? Maybe.

We'll see what the new year brings. I have one book I promised to finish for reviewing purposes by the end of the year, and two I put on ye olde Christmas list. Get a new hobby? Perish the thought! How else can I maintain my self-imposed reputation as a geek?

I read, therefore I am.

Saturday, December 06, 2008

Cleaning Up Amsterdam

It seems the government of Amsterdam has finally decided that all those brothels and marijuana joints (er, shops) are not such a great thing after all. According to this article,

The city is targeting businesses that "generate criminality," including gambling parlors, and the so-called "coffee shops" where marijuana is sold openly. Also targeted are peep shows, massage parlors and souvenir shops used by drug dealers for money-laundering.

Brothels, gambling parlors, and marijuana are generating criminality? I'm shocked, shocked...next you'll be telling me that there's organized crime in Las Vegas--oh, wait... Still, the head shops (etc.) will not go away completely:

"It'll be a place with 200 windows (for prostitutes) and 30 coffee shops, which you can't find anywhere else in the world - very exciting, but also with cultural attractions," he said. "And you won't have to be embarrassed to say you came."

So: use zoning laws to create upscale houses for prostitution and marijuana shops? That's one way of handling it, I suppose. The Japanese Tokugawa Shogunate did something similar in Edo (Tokyo), by restricting geisha prostitutes to particular districts.

Now mind you, I won't be going around Amsterdam with a pile of Bibles and chastising people for immoral behavior. When in Rome, you needn't do everything the Romans do...or so my theory goes.

Bad Behavior, Embarrassing Pictures, and Job Security in Internet Age

It's amazing how many people have put themselves into hot water by posting or having things posted about their behavior on the Internet. Consider the following:

An Obama speechwriter is in trouble for joking around with a friend and pretending to grope the breast of a Hillary Clinton cutout.

In the sports world, a Calgary Flames hockey player is about to be suspended for comments he made regarding another player picking up his "sloppy seconds" (i.e. his ex-girlfriend).

But one need not look to the famous to see examples of people screwing up their lives because of some bad behavior appearing on the internet. Workers have been fired for postings made on Facebook. Criminals have been caught showing off or doing bizarre things and then bragging about it on the Internet.

What is it with people? Once upon a time, people had pictures taken at inopportune times, and they could burn the negatives and be done with it. No more. Now those pictures can be taken with a phone and emailed around the world before any explanation or apology can be issued. Even the burning-the-negatives-and-prints strategy is not a guarantee that personal foibles remain private. Digital scanners can commit those pictures to electronic format, and from there they end up who knows where.

Aside from the crudity and general stupidity of the actions, there's also this seemingly willful ignorance of how actions performed in the virtual world can affect the real world. The internet, with its limited, albeit worldwide opportunity for publicity, allows people to put their personalities "out there" for all to see. I've succumbed to this myself, via blogging and Facebook. But I also know that my coworkers and managers either read or see what I do. Thus my unwillingness to get extremely foul in my language or to post pictures from friends' bachelor parties. The electronic world has made everyone potential victims of tabloid journalism, and I don't think Gen Y has fully absorbed what that can mean for their futures.

The bottom line on all this is that, if you do something stupid and photographic evidence exists that you did said stupid thing--or you yourself have posted that evidence--you have to accept that there will be consequences. That Obama speech writer and hockey player are about to learn what those consequences are. With the internet and wireless and digital cameras everywhere, it is increasingly difficult to avoid any private sins from becoming very public. And that lack of privacy and public willingness to display (or unwillingness to hide) bad behavior can result in you losing your job. It might not sound fair, but it is very much the way of the world.

There was a phrase that was very popular in the '60s: "The personal is political." Well, welcome to the 21st century, where "The personal is professional." Meaning, if you exhibit some sort of negative personal behavior or attitude or belief, and it's on the internet, your professional future can be eroded very quickly if you embarrass your employer. Bosses can Google, too.

Wednesday, December 03, 2008

Learning Styles: Visual, Audio, Kinesthetic...Hypertext?

It has come to my attention that literary/book reading is becoming less and less common. Blame it on whatever you want: TV, the internet, video games, cell phones, blogging, etc. One of my big concerns is the potential effect on STEM education. It seems to me that math, science, and the lot require slow, methodical, and linear thinking that can only be done through book reading. But perhaps I'm wrong.

Is it possible to teach linear processes like physics in a nonlinear fashion? We've seen the emergence of hypertext, nonlinear, and video game-based story telling--so can we get students to learn more serious subjects in the same environments? Some studies suggest that it might be possible (here, here, and here). My question would be, if we cannot adapt necessary learning to the environments kids know, can or should we force them to use plain old paper and blackboards to learn the stuff they'll need to keep up with nations that ARE still using them? What would be the result?

I must contemplate further. Inputs or additional sources/references welcome.

Tuesday, December 02, 2008

Random Stories from the Net

Count de Monet: "Your highness, the peasants are revolting!"
Louis XVI: "You're right, they stink on ice!"

--History of the World Part I

In the same spirit, consider this moment of condescension from Senator Harry Reid: http://www.dcexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/YeasandNays/Reid_We_wont_smell_the_tourists_anymore_12_02_2008.html

*

President-elect Obama is being warned that Iran might have a nuclear weapon during the first year of his term: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article5275647.ece

*

High tides continue to flood Venice: http://apnews.myway.com/article/20081202/D94QNEN81.html

*

Talk about offering up a pound of flesh...

"As part of its plan, Ford announced that the salary of Ford CEO Alan Mulally would be cut to $1 a year if Ford actually borrowed money from the government."

Imagine you're in one of the lifeboats from the Titanic as you watch the liner sink toward a watery grave. Would you actually feel better, and would your own personal situation be improved, if you knew that Captain Smith was going to receive a pay cut? Yes, I'm serious.

*

The attackers in Mumbai came from Pakistan. http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/12/02/asia/mumbai.php. This, of course, surprises no one who's read the history of India or seen the movie about Mohandas K. Gandhi.

*

That's about enough surfing for now. Let's be careful out there.

Monday, December 01, 2008

Flooding Problems in Venice

Well, this will make 2009's visit more interesting...presumably the waters will have subsided by then.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article5266829.ece

Well, Duhhhhh...

Psssst! Hey, did you know that we were in a recession? It MUST be true! I saw it on CNN.com!

http://money.cnn.com/2008/12/01/news/economy/recession/index.htm?cnn=yes

Of course the Wizards of the Obvious in Atlanta have also been saying that we were on the verge of a major economic downturn since the beginning of the Bush administration. Now they've got what they wanted. I hope they're happy.

What's utterly amazing about this is that once it's "official" that we're in a recession, the Dow decided to drop another 600+ points. It's like a man is having desperate pains in his chest and arms, but until a doctor comes by and says, "You're having a heart attack," it isn't really real.

More on Mumbai...

I wonder, if this guy was captured in the U.S. and tried in a civil court, if he'd try to sue. Probably.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,459368,00.html