Pages

Showing posts with label maturity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label maturity. Show all posts

Thursday, June 13, 2013

The Cult of the Kid

Recently I lamented the immature portrayal Chris Pine gave of Captain James T. Kirk. I suppose I should at least give him credit for acting like a 20-something instead of someone younger. And I'm probably an ebony pot making kettle-like references in some cases. Do I drink soda instead of coffee? Do I have comic books ("graphic novels") on my bookshelves as well as serious literature for grownups? Is my primary vacation destination Orlando and Disney World rather than some serious city with museums and culture? Guilty.

And yet I still want and prefer the life of the adult: responsibility, career, cleanliness, orderliness, sanity, serious conversations, aspiration, depth, personal growth, dependability, philosophy, taxpaying. Mind you, I stop short of some of the other things to which adults are supposed to aspire--marriage and children, for example--but I keep myself quietly domesticated and have made some efforts to restrain my urges toward the tacky, the immature, and the obnoxious. And yet...and yet...I find myself falling into the mindset crystallized so neatly by this XKCD comic:


Somewhere along the line, Americans gave up the notion that we were going to become like our parents, only better or smarter. The notion of building a life or improving on civilization seems hilarious if spoken of in the same breath as a GenXer. Maybe that's why actors in movies from before I was born seem so much older. They act more maturely, more restrained even in comedy. Consider the sly wit of Cary Grant to the oafish blathering of...what's his name again? Oh yeah: Adam Sandler. Comedy is now profanity, pushing the limits of acceptable taste. And what's acceptable has slid downhill quite a bit since my parents were young. Hollywood was actually funnier when they had censors because they pushed the limits without any word that would raise an eyebrow.

And, again, the goals of melodramas today circulate around hooking up or just getting a boyfriend/girlfriend. I purposely use the term "lady friend" because girlfriend seems a tad too young--for me and whoever I'm dating. I'm very quickly crowding up on my mid 40s. Shouldn't I be dating women, not girls?

But yet I work in an office where we all have Nerf guns at our desks. I have a Darth Vader cookie jar on my counter top. Do we really want a cult of perpetual childhood--or adolescence? I've worked in companies where a game must be played in a classroom full of adults in order to get people motivated to participate. If my bar conversation strays into some heavy topic--politics, metaphysics, cultural decay--I'm told that I need to "relax" or that I have too much time on my hands. Apparently some folks don't understand that this IS how I relax. The future is going to look pretty awful if no one wants to be the grownup in the room.

This isn't something I've picked up because I'm approaching 44 this year. I've always been this way. I never wanted to be a kid. Kids are young and stupid. Adults never let them do anything interesting, like have cool jobs or take vacations to cool places, or drive a car. Kids--sorry parents, it has to be said--can't change the world the way adults can. They don't know enough about how things work. They don't have the wisdom or education to form a corporation or invent feasible, complex technologies. You wouldn't put one in charge of a country, an airliner, a spacecraft, a nuclear power plant, or a serious weapon--at least not if you had a healthy sense of self-preservation. These are the things I strove to do because they seemed important. As a kid, all you learned were the basics (if your teacher was good enough and your peers allowed you to) or you learned how to deal with your peers--and when you're young, they're as ignorant as you are, so what are you really able to learn from them? Not a whole lot.

So allow a moment, if you will, to give thanks for the grownups of the world: the people who show up every day to raise children, build our civilization, protect it, and keep it functioning. Adults do these things so that eventually their children can grow up, learn, and take over where the parents left off. And maybe, if the young are paying attention and do learn to mature, they might make things a little bit better for their kids. But that improvement process doesn't happen if they, we, and I don't accept that we have to grow up eventually.

As St. Paul put it to the Greek Christians living in First Century Corinth, "When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put the ways of childhood behind me." (1 Cor. 13:11)

Sunday, June 02, 2013

Movie Review: Star Trek: Into Darkness

No promises on whether I'll share "spoilers" or not. The risk is up to you.

Short version: Yes, the new Star Trek is as fun and action-packed as the first JJ Abrams movie. No, I'm not embracing the movie fully because it lacks the maturity of the TV series and other films.

If you want more of my "insights," read on.

Some audiences crave "origin stories," such as the beginnings of Batman, Superman, or Robin Hood. I suppose we all like to know where heroes truly come from and what makes them who they are. Great. In my mind, that was the purpose of the first JJ Abrams outing, when he rebooted the series and (reverse spoiler here) created a timeline that completely annihilated all of the Star Trek stories seen to date except the Enterprise series.

But it's been a few years now. James T. Kirk, Mr. Spock, and the rest of the crew have had some time to grow into their roles on the flagship of the United Federation of Planets. Certainly that is enough time for Kirk to settle down a bit and--jeez, there's no other way to say this--grow up. Chris Pine is about the same age William Shatner was when he first assumed the role of Starfleet's most action-craving, hormonal starship captain. Yet he looks and acts about ten years younger. He's got all the subtlety of a phaser blast to the head ("Helloooo, ladies!"). I had a discussion with my employer about this--he taking the position that Kirk would have acted exactly this way early in his career, before he learned a little more and smoothed out some of the rough edges. I would simply say that Shatner's Kirk had a certain restraint and charm about him that Pine's Kirk lacks.

Okay, fine. But two films are enough to get the point across that before Kirk became the eminent, stolid galaxy-saver that he was in the series and the movies, he was a walking Axe commercial, punching every guy and making love to every green woman to cross his path. Eventually he grew up, mellowed out, got smarter. I think it's about time Mr. Abrams take Chris Pine's Kirk to that level. Even Spock (as portrayed by Zachary Quinto) has some unvarnished emotional outpourings that are not in keeping with the stoic we came to know through most of the Star Trek canon. Karl Urban's Dr. McCoy is all gruff and grouchiness without the gentleness of the "old country doctor" we've known. Scotty is a sarcastic smartass rather than the bookish, geeky character created by James Doohan. The characters Uhura, Sulu, and Chekov are perhaps truest to the characters created by Nichelle Nichols, George Takei, and Walter Koenig, but they all look too young to be where they are. I loved my friend Dea's comment after seeing the film: "They gave these yahoos a starship?"

Yes, I realize the characters are supposed to be younger. Yes, I realize that actors are entitled to some interpretation in their work. The problem is, we've had 40 years of the same actors portraying these characters. We have a pretty good idea of how they operate, think, and act. And yes, some of us like them that way. It's been a pleasure watching the actors (and their writers) mature and build upon the work they did for a short-lived TV series years ago. I for one am used to the older--here's that word again--more mature portrayals of the Star Trek crew. Yes, I can enjoy a few chuckles as I watch the start of Spock and McCoy's feuds or Scotty yelling that he's "givin' her all she's got," but eventually I want to see them experience new, mind-expanding adventures.

And thus I arrive, belatedly, at the plot of Star Trek: Into Darkness, which is simultaneously exciting and a narrative mess. To JJ Abrams' credit, a lot of the predicaments the Enterprise crew face are the result of the immaturity of their adrenaline junkie commanding officer, and that adrenaline-seeking captain keeps the action moving, albeit in strange directions. So what are we facing here? Random terrorism, secret plots within the Federation, journeys to distant planets, angry admirals, sexy admiral's daughters, and crashing starships. I'm not giving away much here--that's most of what's in the trailers. However, much like James Cameron's films, if you spend too much time logically analyzing the plot here, you will find yourself exclaiming, "What?!?? Did they really just do that?"

The biggest gripe I have with Into Darkness, aside from the relentless, nearly mindless brashness of Kirk, is the amount of dialogue and storytelling they lifted wholesale from previous movies or episodes. If you're going to reboot a beloved series, the idea should be to take it in new directions, not rehash old material with additional stunts or effects. We've now had one film that set the new stage and one film that rehashed old material. It's time to take this younger version of the familiar crew on a new adventure that grows the characters and the series. Throw in a social message, an intellectual puzzle, a story with emotional resonance, a mind-blowing science fictional concept, or all of the above. Kirk was not just an action hero, and Star Trek was not just an action-adventure series. It's time that we saw that.

Saturday, August 30, 2008

Young Men Not Growing Up

I'm shocked, shocked...

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/26317942/?GT1=43001

I guess I have another book to read, then: http://www.amazon.com/Guyland-Perilous-World-Where-Become/dp/0060831340/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1220116233&sr=8-1

Though it's interesting to note that Amazon readers (so far) have given it only one star.